...
Review the SEBA RD as a whole and ensure that the document includes up-to-date information, deprecating out of date items.
In addition, consider the recommendations from the joint TT [1] as input to the uplift of the document. To date, the TRs 413 (SBI), 451 (OMCI) and 477 (Disaggregated Access Node) have been analysed and they key recommendation is to include [Recommendation 1] NC/YANG as an implementation option in SEBA-based solutions and, where implemented, this should follow the appropriate BBF TRs and Common YANG models.
Scope of (known) changes
Initial analysis of SEBA RD indicates that very few changes are expected in the SEBA RD to align with [Recommendation 1]. This includes the items below although this is not an exclusive list:
...
· Add new sections for the specific items already analysed, e.g. how vOMCI and OpenOMCI can co-exist and align, specific references to VOLTHA additions to the BBF Common YANG models[2] updating /uplifting existing text and potentially a short new section (s) on relevant topic(s) in the scope
· Review the accuracy of and completeness of the document as a whole for general consistency and accuracy of information which may have arisen since the last publication
Clarify the scope of the RD itself regarding “Design Document” based on implementations or a blueprint cross-referencing work ongoing elsewhere.
Contributors List:
Francisco DeCarvalho francisco.decarvalho@radisys.com;
Serkant Uluderya serkant.uluderya@netsia.com
<your name>
...
[1] https://wiki.broadband-forum.org/display/BBF/BBF+and+LF+Alignment+Tiger+Team+-+Disaggregated+Access+Nodes%2C+SBI+and+NBI
[2] These have already been ratified by the BBF in Common YANG TRs (e.g. 383/385)
...